[32043] in Kerberos
Re: Fwd: [Bug 1242] GSSAPI Keyexchange support
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Garrett Wollman)
Wed Feb 10 12:42:05 2010
From: wollman@bimajority.org (Garrett Wollman)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <hkti9e$tr3$1@grapevine.csail.mit.edu>
X-Complaints-To: security@csail.mit.edu
To: kerberos@mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
In article <mailman.307.1265769445.4612.kerberos@mit.edu>,
Simon Wilkinson <simon@sxw.org.uk> wrote:
>Just because I know readers of this list have been following the GSSAPI
>Key Exchange saga over the last 9 years, I thought the following mail
>from OpenSSH's bug tracking system might be of interest.
>
>I still believe that their argument is bogus, and I will continue to
>maintain the OpenSSH key exchange patch. As far as I'm aware, RedHat are
>now the only major vendor who ship OpenSSH without it.
Is it time to just fork OpenSSH and be done with it?
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wollman@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
