[32002] in Kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

multiple kdc masters with resilient LDAP backend

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (rhod davies)
Tue Feb 2 07:36:21 2010

MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:35:53 +0000
Message-ID: <f8b49e0c1002020435i73280106lb35aa05ac547755@mail.gmail.com>
From: rhod davies <nomrhod@googlemail.com>
To: Kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

I've been reading through the mail archives, and doing the obligatory
google search, but seem to be hitting a brick wall on trying to get a
better understanding of something that should be trivial to get a
handle on (I think).

MIT Kerberos 1.7 configured with a KLDAP backend to a multi-master
resilient LDAP
service; single realm.

I understand that we can run multiple KDCs in an autonomous way, but
sharing the same data store (in LDAP), this is good, and what I want
to have - i.e. a resilient KDC service.  We can misplace a data
centre, but still offer a KDC service as LDAP has made sure that the
data is replicated around the globe.

There are references to individual/groups who have done this, and all
looks well.  However what are the pitfalls with this approach?
Specifiaclly:

- Is any local state held by the krb5kdc process that would cause
issues down the line?

- Ar there any issues with running multiple master (same backing store
- LDAP) for the same realm?

In a similar vein can kadmind be made resilient in the same manner
(all documents I've seen so far are catagorical that only one kadmind
service should be running).

Many Thanks.

-- 
Rhod

________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post