[24268] in Kerberos
Re: Assertion failuers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (fariba)
Mon Jul 11 04:59:07 2005
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:59:26 -0700
From: fariba <fariba@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <tslmzoutp2z.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Message-id: <42D234EE.3050008@usc.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
cc: Toan Nguyen <toan@usc.edu>
cc: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@mit.edu>
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
thank you. may be i should explain what o really want to know: why by
disabling the threads our problem on 2.6 went away? why using these
flags was suggested? is multi-threading support kind of buggy?
Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>"fariba" == fariba <fariba@usc.edu> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> fariba> i work with phil as well. i was wondering what are the
> fariba> proc/con of using these flags:
>
> fariba> --disable-shared --enable-static --disable-threads
>
>It turns off threads support which gets you roughly the 1.3.x
>behavior. If miltiple threads are using the library at once you can
>run into problems. It disables shared libraries and enables static
>libraries. That means that Kerberos is linked into each application
>instead of using a dynamic library.
>
>
>--Sam
>
>
>
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
