[23948] in Kerberos
Re: mixing sun solaris's rpc with mit's rpc
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (fariba)
Fri May 27 15:23:42 2005
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:22:53 -0700
From: fariba <fariba@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <42975B02.5080700@usc.edu>
To: Kevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
Message-id: <4297738D.3050504@usc.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
plus comparing solaris's netdb.h with the mit's: what should we replace
gethostbyname, etc?
fariba wrote:
> hostent in netdb.h seems to be changed to rpcent in mit 1.4.1
> gssrpc/netdb.h. in our routins we assign sockaddr_in.s_addr to
> hostent.h_addr. rpcent does not have a such entry!
>
> Kevin Coffman wrote:
>
>>> has anybody used sun's rpc and mit's rpc in a kerborised
>>> application? the mit's rpc (gssrpc) is to be used for encrypted
>>> communication and the sun's rpc is used for non-encrypted
>>> communication. we have such a program but we want to upgrade to
>>> 5-1.4.1 version of kerberos, but the header files are quite
>>> different now and we run into compilation issues. whereas we did not
>>> have a problem with prior kerberos releases. we use solaris 2.6 ,
>>> 2.8 and 2.9. also anybody ever used sun's rpc and kerberos to
>>> communicate with mit's kerberos server? i appreciate the help very
>>> much. thank you.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Are you talking about differences between 1.3.x rpc headers and
>> 1.4.1 headers?
>>
>> What kind of problems are you having? I'm looking at changes to our
>> version of the rpc library which we need for NFSv4.
>>
>>
>>
>
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
