[23751] in Kerberos
Re: strength of encryption types
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Thu Apr 21 23:04:42 2005
To: <Rahul.Jain@wellsfargo.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:03:45 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<C4E630F8313DF14C982F9FC7CCCF2A2A2FE4AF@msgswbmnmsp18.wellsfargo.com> (Rahul
Jain's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:40:04 -0500")
Message-ID: <tslsm1jcy26.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "h" == <Rahul.Jain@wellsfargo.com> writes:
h> How strong is 3DES with MD5 without HMAC or key derivation?
Keep in mind that practically the only thing using 3des without hmac
or KD is packetcable or Cybersafe. In particular, Heimdal, MIT and
Sun's Java implementation all implement kd and hmac.
--Sam
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
