[23343] in Kerberos
Re: RFC 1510
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeffrey Hutzelman)
Tue Feb 8 12:46:23 2005
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:44:52 -0500
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Dan Million <elleyeoh@ornl.gov>, kerberos@mit.edu
Message-ID: <D9E3CFC8C17AC8674352EF55@SIRIUS.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <cuas6n$i3q$1@sws1.ornl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 12:17:11 PM -0500 Dan Million
<elleyeoh@ornl.gov> wrote:
> I am trying to learn more about the innards of Kerberos. I have started
> to read RFC 1510, but it is over 11 years old and I was wondering: has
> Kerberos changed enough since then that reading this RFC would be a
> waste of time?
>
> Anyone have an opinion on this?
You should instead read
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-07.txt
draft-ietf-krb-wg-crypto-07.txt
draft-raeburn-krb-rijndael-krb-07.txt
These documents are in the RFC-Editor queue awaiting publication.
Collectively, they define the next version of the Kerberos specification.
-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+@cmu.edu>
Chair, IETF Kerberos Working Group
Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
