[23245] in Kerberos
Re: Krb5 API vs. GSSAPI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wyllys Ingersoll)
Mon Jan 24 11:31:26 2005
Message-ID: <41F5227C.5030305@sun.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:29:48 -0500
From: Wyllys Ingersoll <wyllys.ingersoll@sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lukeh@padl.com
In-Reply-To: <200501190513.j0J5DL98005349@au.padl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: fredrik@dolda2000.com
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Luke Howard wrote:
>>Is that so? I've only ever seen Kerberos being carried out over GSSAPI.
>>What others are there?
>>
>>
>
>Here is a list that Martin Rex of SAP posted to the ietf-kitten mailing
>list (to which I would add SPNEGO and NTLM):
>
>ietf mechanism: Company (Country)
>
> Kerberos 5 MIT, CyberSafe, CA/Platinum, Microsoft, heimdal
>
>
Sun also delivers a Krb5 mechanism (based on MIT).
> SPKM Entrust (CA), Shym (US), Baltimore (US)
>
>proprietary mechanisms:
>
>
>
Diffie-Hellman Sun
> AM-DCE Bull (FR)
> (propr.) Sagem (FR)
> sdti,rsakeon,trustnet TFS-Tech (SE) former RSA/SDTI
> safelayer Safelayer (SP)
> NEC Secureware NEC (JP)
> itsec UBS/ITsec (CH)
> Adnovum GSSv2 UBS/Adnovum (CH)
> ISign/secui Penta Security Systems (South Korea)
> Sisler Siemens India (India)
> cpro Mecomp (RU)
> lissi Lissi (RU)
> kobil Kobil GmbH (DE)
> T-Secure secunet/Telekom (DE)
>
>-- Luke
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
