[23222] in Kerberos
Re: Krb5 API vs. GSSAPI
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Luke Howard)
Wed Jan 19 00:14:28 2005
From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
Message-Id: <200501190513.j0J5DL98005349@au.padl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: fredrik@dolda2000.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:13:21 +1100
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Reply-To: lukeh@padl.com
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
>Is that so? I've only ever seen Kerberos being carried out over GSSAPI.
>What others are there?
Here is a list that Martin Rex of SAP posted to the ietf-kitten mailing
list (to which I would add SPNEGO and NTLM):
ietf mechanism: Company (Country)
Kerberos 5 MIT, CyberSafe, CA/Platinum, Microsoft, heimdal
SPKM Entrust (CA), Shym (US), Baltimore (US)
proprietary mechanisms:
AM-DCE Bull (FR)
(propr.) Sagem (FR)
sdti,rsakeon,trustnet TFS-Tech (SE) former RSA/SDTI
safelayer Safelayer (SP)
NEC Secureware NEC (JP)
itsec UBS/ITsec (CH)
Adnovum GSSv2 UBS/Adnovum (CH)
ISign/secui Penta Security Systems (South Korea)
Sisler Siemens India (India)
cpro Mecomp (RU)
lissi Lissi (RU)
kobil Kobil GmbH (DE)
T-Secure secunet/Telekom (DE)
-- Luke
--
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
