[22637] in Kerberos
RE: Kerberos behind load balancer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kasundra, Digant)
Wed Oct 6 13:39:06 2004
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:37:11 -0500
Message-ID: <2BF615FBFB12BB47B6501D04376E657A0B0A7B@MAILFS1.uta.edu>
From: "Kasundra, Digant" <digant@uta.edu>
To: "Tillman Hodgson" <tillman@seekingfire.com>, <kerberos@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Anycast looks promising.
-----Original Message-----
From: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Tillman Hodgson
Sent: Wed 10/6/2004 12:15 PM
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: Re: Kerberos behind load balancer?
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 12:07:23PM -0500, Kasundra, Digant wrote:
>> I agree that the load is not an issue. But with out DNS round-robin,
>> and without the load-balancer, we'd have to arbitrarily point our
>> systems and services at one of the slaves. If that slave goes down,
>> we'd have to scramble to see who all was pointing to it and change
>> them to point to the other place.
>Anycast. Kerberos auth is UDP, after all.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
