[22609] in Kerberos
Re: Heimdal or MIT kerberos
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Mon Oct 4 13:11:29 2004
To: lukeh@padl.com
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 13:09:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200410040657.i946vCCJ023576@au.padl.com> (Luke Howard's
message of "Mon, 4 Oct 2004 16:57:12 +1000")
Message-ID: <tsl3c0ujtqj.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
cc: fcusack@fcusack.com
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Luke" == Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com> writes:
>> If heimdal is thread-safe, that's news to me. You shouldn't
>> care if the apps you plan to use are off the shelf (sounds that
>> way).
Luke> Recent snapshots have explicit concurrency support -- I'm
Luke> not sure which, if any, of the releases include this.
As do recent snapshots of MIt Kerberos; the upcoming 1.4 release will
include this work.
--Sam
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
