[19637] in Kerberos
RE: MIT Kerberos: is it Thread-Safe?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kent_Wu@trendmicro.com)
Tue Jul 22 13:25:35 2003
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:22:49 -0700
Message-ID: <7DE4EF03D8D61B44B927E4A059B2644C017B03CA@65-200-113-18.trendmicro.com>
From: <Kent_Wu@trendmicro.com>
To: <Nikola.Milutinovic@ev.co.yu>, <kerberos@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
Are you sure Heimdal is thread-safe? Like a month ago I checked with
them and theirs is not thread-safe either.
Kent
-----Original Message-----
From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:Nikola.Milutinovic@ev.co.yu]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 10:14 PM
To: kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: MIT Kerberos: is it Thread-Safe?
Hi all.
As the subject says, is MIT Kerberos thread-safe and if it is, which version?
OpenLDAP FAQ warns that MIT Kerberos libraries are not thread safe and that one should either use "--no-threads" when building it or build with Heimdal implementation. Now, I have gotten quite used to MIT Kerberos, have built several packages linked with it. It would be a drag to switch to Heimdal now.
Nix.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
