[19477] in Kerberos
Re: string-to-key in Windows Server 2003
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Thu Jun 26 17:08:54 2003
To: Ben Cox <cox-work@djehuti.com>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 17:06:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1056660521.6233.34.camel@cox-pc.spinnakernet.com> (Ben Cox's
message of "26 Jun 2003 16:48:41 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslwuf85z0x.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Cox <cox-work@djehuti.com> writes:
Ben> Did the string-to-key algorithm change in Win 2003? (Or does
Ben> it use a different mechanism for generating the salt?)
I've certainly seen it use Administrator rather than administrator as
part of a salt in the case of the administrator principal. I don't
know about other principals and whether the salt has changed.
--Sam
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
