[19411] in Kerberos
Re: krb524.dll - calling conventions on Windows
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ken Raeburn)
Wed Jun 11 17:33:06 2003
To: kerberos@MIT.EDU, krbdev@MIT.EDU
From: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:32:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <OF79A1EC8A.553AC70E-ON85256D42.0073948B@db.com> ("Frank
Balluffi"'s message of "Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:17:20 -0400")
Message-ID: <tx17k7sqp0s.fsf@mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
(Please *don't* cc "kerberos-bounces" on messages to the kerberos and
krbdev mailing lists. There's a reason it's the sender and *not* in
the "from" or recipient fields. All that's there is a program trying
to parse incoming messages to decide who needs deleting from the
mailing list. If your mail program's "reply" operation includes both
the "from" and "sender" fields, it's broken.)
"Frank Balluffi" <frank.balluffi@db.com> writes:
> Jeffrey,
>
> The pascal calling convention is now obsolete (see
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/vclang/html/_core_obsolete_calling_conventions.asp).
> The current choices are listed at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/vclang/html/_core_Argument_Passing_and_Naming_Conventions.asp.
I think Jeff mis-spoke; it's __cdecl versus __stdcall that we care
about. I think, by "Pascal", he meant the callee-cleanup convention;
I don't know whether or how __pascal is different from __stdcall...
Ken
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
