[19185] in Kerberos
Re: Keytabs in Kerberos
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sam Hartman)
Sat May 3 16:50:35 2003
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@mit.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 16:47:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <tx1y91px87z.fsf@mit.edu> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Fri, 02
May 2003 19:02:56 -0400")
Message-ID: <87n0i3g3l0.fsf@luminous.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: greg@enjellic.com
cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
>>>>> "Ken" == Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU> writes:
Ken> greg@wind.enjellic.com (Dr. Greg Wettstein) writes:
>> Actually a great idea, would the core team accept patches if
>> they were to be worked up?
Ken> Unless people disagree with this approach -- and I haven't
Ken> really talked to them much about any specifics -- I don't see
Ken> why not. (With caveats about code quality, test cases,
Ken> copyright or license terms, etc.)
I think that we do need to think about the appdefaults vs libdefaults
issue.
I believe that our final decision on how that works should be based on
user experience not code paths.
Besides that, I think such support would be a great idea.
If we do use appdefaults, we'd need a format that did not involve
iterating through all the keys in a relation.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
