[204] in Intrusion Detection Systems
Re: IDS Mail Loop Problems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joji joseph)
Tue May 16 13:38:14 1995
Date: Tue, 16 May 95 10:42:44 EDT
From: joji@sys013.tiaa.org (joji joseph)
To: ids@uow.edu.au
Reply-To: ids@uow.edu.au
Mistake was done. Error was pointed out. Appology followed. Solutions were posted, Why do guys fight?? Leave "ids" for something good to get through.
Joji.
From owner-ids@uow.edu.au Mon May 15 21:20:32 1995
From: tju@akira.corp.sgi.com (T. Jason Ucker)
References: <9505151544.AA27146@brittany.oes.amdahl.com>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail-SGI (3.2S.1 10apr95 MediaMail)
To: ids@uow.edu.au
Subject: Re: IDS Mail Loop Problems
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type : text/plain ; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-ids@uow.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ids@uow.edu.au
Content-Length: 694
X-Lines: 18
On May 15, 8:44am, Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Subject: Re: IDS Mail Loop Problems
> >
> > This is *direct* result of directing all replies to the list by default
> > (creating a "Reply-to:" header containing the list address). I know we just
> > had a flame war about this, but hopefully this direct evidence about why
> > this is a very bad idea might convince the list managers to reconsider
> > their policy.
> I'll second this as I usually do, (unless I was the one that brought it up.)
Make it 3. Out of the 15 mailing lists I'm on, this is the only one that has
this frustrating 'feature.'
-Jason
--
T. Jason Ucker Sys Admin/jSE
tju@sgi.com Silicon Graphics Inc.
