[271] in I/T Delivery

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Minutes 5 November 1999 Project Team Leaders Meeting

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Reid M. Pinchback)
Fri Nov 5 12:22:37 1999

Message-Id: <2.2.32.19991105172505.013de7a0@po9.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 1999 12:25:05 -0500
To: Bill Cattey <wdc@mit.edu>, magellan@mit.edu, delivery@mit.edu,
        integration-ptl@mit.edu, tomt@mit.edu
From: "Reid M. Pinchback" <reidmp@MIT.EDU>

At 05:13 PM 11/5/99 +0000, Bill Cattey wrote:
>    Oracle -- Reid Pinchback
>      We are now at a transition point where it is becoming more
>      risky to stay with Oracle 7 than to migrate to Oracle 8.
>      Today 7.3.4 is ok for projects starting today, but
>      6 months from now, Oracle 8 should be SERIOUSLY considered.

Just as a clarification for those who weren't at the meeting, it is
Oracle 8i, not 8, that will warrant consideration, for two reasons:

1. The 8i versions are starting to solidify (so production use 8i
   will become increasingly feasible).

2. At some point, probably in the next year or so, I expect the 7.3
   versions will be de-supported by Oracle.  That will nudge us to 
   gradually migrate our services to newer database versions, and to
   start using the newer versions when we launch new projects.


====================================================
= Reid M. Pinchback                                =
= I/T Delivery, MIT                                =
=                                                  =
= Email:   reidmp@mit.edu                          =
= URL:     http://mit.edu/reidmp/www/home.html     =
=                                                  =
= Respect your own privacy; boycott Pentium III    =
====================================================


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post