| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 16:44:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com> To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com In-Reply-To: <ae61bb3e00021004ed98@[207.167.93.63]> On Sun, 15 Sep 1996, Timothy C. May wrote: > I have no problem with letting them stay in agony (but you all knew this). > > "Saving for a rainy day," whether saving, investing, getting an education > (while others are out partying), preparing, etc., all takes effort and > commitment. If those who save and prepare are then told they have to pay > high taxes to support those who partied....well, the predictable effect is > that many of them will say "I'll just party and let The System take care of > me." Thus, the effect of "not letting them stay in agony" is _more_ people > in agony. When you tell people that a compassionate society will meet their > basic needs, a predictable fraction of them will choose not to work hard > and prepare themselves. > > I say we need to let about 20 million Americans, and a couple of billion in > the rest of the world, meet their fate. > > While I will not _actively_ seek to dispose of them, I will work to make > sure they cannot continue to subsidize their lives at my expense. As usual, Tim sums it up. Or as Duncan once wrote [not an exact quote] "If aid to the poor hadn't been successful, there wouldn't be so many of them" --Lucky
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |