[14691] in Cypherpunks
more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Weaver)
Fri Jun 3 12:57:03 1994
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 94 09:52:02 PDT
From: Eric_Weaver@avtc.sel.sony.com (Eric Weaver)
To: sommerfeld@localhost.medford.ma.us
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: Bill Sommerfeld's message of Fri, 3 Jun 1994 09:57:36 -0400 <199406031357.JAA00376@localhost>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 1994 09:57:36 -0400
From: sommerfeld@localhost.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
They [The NSA] also had a comment that they considered Blaze's
findings to be mostly irrelevant, as the only people who would use
it would be persons who *didn't* trust the escrow system, but *did*
trust the algorithm...
- Bill
OOOooooo. I think this means one had better use superencryption of
one kind or another with Clipper at all times. Pardon me if this
is redundant, but has anybody done any differential analysis of, say,
DES (or 3DES) under Clipper, to see if it weakens?
