[14137] in Cypherpunks
Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert A. Hayden)
Wed May 25 13:21:42 1994
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 12:20:19 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
To: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <m0q69KT-000IB9C@crynwr>
On Tue, 24 May 1994, Russell Nelson wrote:
> So maybe what we (the c'punk community) need to do is maintain
> parallel versions of PGP (ick), one which continues to use 100% GPL'ed
> code, and another which uses RSAREF to stay legal.
I may be foolish, but...
What if (the cypherpunk community) comes out with a secure program that
doesn't rely on RSAREF? Can it be done?
NOTE: I very likely don't know what I'm talking about.
____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=-
\/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is
\/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)
