[14110] in Cypherpunks
Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ezekial Palmer)
Wed May 25 01:28:01 1994
Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 22:06:05 -0700
To: (Blind List Only)
From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 May 1994 12:43:46 EST."
<9405250243.AA03397@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)
Subject: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:43:46 EST
Being Australian, I've not read the RSAREF conditions, but there is at
the point that commercial use will still not be possible (at it would
be under non-RSAREF 2.3a) when the RSA patent expires.
The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.
Zeke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLeK/+xVg/9j67wWxAQGNqgP9FrqJ77ru0vH6mii7m9AElRfdqLvrFuum
7pRINtNpyW9qLtU8cQbdriAWJaxZX7CK70XkHPiSOXaIJ/A+pWrp4VW0f2F9vGBX
W3HkERqGT9ikOxDVHAq5Qk3IvvXss+Ms+QdzGSDRK1bAgzJLH/YYbsdpsXW4+fgi
raltpxGcZvg=
=i4MI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
