|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 12 May 1994 10:28:03 -0700 From: ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson) To: ecarp@netcom.com Cc: upham@cs.ubc.ca, cypherpunks@toad.com In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9405120948.A11766-0100000@netcom10> (message from Ed Carp on Thu, 12 May 1994 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)) > How about auto-moderation? I came up with this idea a while back for > automatically moderating mailing lists. Here's how it works: > ... > If a person becomes a nuisance, people send their votes in to the > moderator-robot, and it tallies the votes. If within XXX days more thumbs > down votes are received than thumbs up votes, the person is placed on the > disapproved list. > The main advantage is, it's fast and easy to set up. Comments? This would be easy to set up, but instead of discarding message from "disapproved" people I would suggest just tagging which messages are sent by "approved" people and which are not. That way all of the information still gets out there, even if it's unpopular. Peter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |