|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 92 23:28:09 PST From: lars@CMC.COM (Lars Poulsen) To: brian@lloyd.com In-Reply-To: <9201080621.AA01987@ray.lloyd.com> Cc: com-priv@psi.com In article <9201080621.AA01987@ray.lloyd.com> you write: >So it appears that things would be GREATLY simplified if ANS would >simply subscribe to the CIX and let the CIX be the single point of >access to the NSFnet for CO users (with the exception of CO users who >subscribe to ANS directly, of course). Seems to me that this would >completely eliminate the conflict. I agree with you. But so far, all indications are that ANS will NOT join CIX, and then proceed to sign up a few strategic BIG CO customers that everybody needs to talk to; like IBM, CompuServe and Lexis. I would be much less suspicious of ANS, if they joined CIX. -- / Lars Poulsen, SMTS Software Engineer CMC Rockwell lars@CMC.COM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |