[1802] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

fair competition

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Sat Dec 28 22:12:55 1991

To: com-priv@psi.com
Date: 28 Dec 91 21:57:06 EST (Sat)
From: cook@tmn.com (Gordon Cook)


<<MESSAGE from>> Gordon Cook                          28-DEC-91 21:57
                 cook@tmn
 One thing i note about the T-3 core node backbone is that each node has 
 but two paths.  And I believe that each end node has but one path into and 
 out of the MCI national backbone.  Now I am new to networking so there may 
 be something that I am missing here, but as I remember every node except 
 one on the old t-1 backbone had THREE paths to the rest of the network, 
 the one that did not had two paths (the midnet node I believe).
 
 Would it be correct to conclude that such a network topology is MUCH more 
 failure prone than the T-1 net that is about to be turned off.
 
 How DOES the community benefit from the new architecture and the increased 
 speed??  Can someone show me what I am missing?
 
 Rick's note seems to make a lot of sense.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post