[1746] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: More on minor correction to Bill Schrader's posting

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Lee Schoffstall)
Mon Dec 16 11:25:48 1991

To: Stephen Wolff <steve@ncri.cise.nsf.gov>
Cc: alison@oar.net, com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Dec 91 11:03:53 EST."
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 91 11:23:04 -0500
From: "Martin Lee Schoffstall" <schoff@psi.com>


Ahh.  So their "just a subcontractor" of the "original cooperative 
agreement"....

Then could you tell me why ANS is trying to get NEARNet to sign a contract
on a NSFNet T3 connection that you (NSF) bought?  [This from John Rugo's
posting of last week].

Marty
-----


 ->Since the NSF Division of Grants and Contracts reviewed the shift of the
 ->cooperative agreement to ANS, ....
 
 WRONG.  NSF's Cooperative Agreement was, is, and remains with Merit.
 
 What the Division of Grants and Contracts approved was Merit's subcontract to
 ANS.  It is part of the boilerplate in every NSF award that the Foundation
 must approve all subcontracts.
 
 -s

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post