[12087] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Superhighway & Denver Airport

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joseph W. Stroup)
Wed May 4 19:55:17 1994

Date: Wed, 4 May 1994 10:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Joseph W. Stroup" <nettech@crl.com>
To: Morten Reistad <mrr@galba.boers.no>
Cc: com-priv@psi.com, mrr@galba.boers.no
In-Reply-To: <9405041622.AA28404@galba.boers.no.>

Until the CIX gets the (Bal...s ) to stop traffic from sites that are non 
members there is no teeth to their threats. Just because something might 
go away is no reason to keep people from using it, while its there. What 
do you get for $10,000 in the ENFORCEMENT dept. Not much. Non CIX sites 
should be blocked. This includes ANS & Sprint and any other group that 
has customers who are non members. As long as I can get full connectivity 
without paying why should I.

Please understand what I am saying here. I support the CIX idea. I simply 
think the have no guts. I think there are alot of reason why the 
directors don't go to war. Maybe getting sued personally is one of them. 
Whatever the reason - No. # 1 is , Its not in the personal and business 
BEST INTEREST of the main board members. Any trade group run this way is 
headed for troubles. I see it like a "union". And I don't pay dues to 
groups that fail to enforce their agreements. Block the traffic and lets 
see who needs who. If I was a member I would be demanding this.

Joseph Stroup

On Wed, 4 May 1994, Morten Reistad wrote:

>  "Joseph W. Stroup" <nettech@crl.com> remarks in  <Pine.3.87.9405032054.A10829-0100000@crl.crl.com>
> 
> >I think its time we start "NEXT NET" the road that bypassed America's 
> >Electronic Superhighway. With "NEXT NET" you would always be sure of what 
> >you wre getting...No AUP's , no regulations , just everyone for their own 
> >interest. All networks would inter-connect for one reason - POWER.  Who 
> >knows this concept might just work.
> 
> The NEXT NET is already here. It is called the CIX. Now; if we could make
> the NSFnet be just another member, we can all point our default routes
> to the CIX and live happily ever after.
> 
> -- Morten Reistad <mrr@{boers eunet}.no> speaking for myself.
> 
> 
> 


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post