[11675] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: PC Mag Bashes Internet! Good Job!

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Covington)
Wed Apr 13 09:35:15 1994

Date: Tue, 12 Apr 1994 23:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stephen Covington <cvington@netcom.com>
To: Kelly E Gibbs <kgibbs@world.std.com>
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199404122129.AA15394@world.std.com>


On Tue, 12 Apr 1994, Kelly E Gibbs wrote:

> 
> PC Mags attack on the Internet was long overdue.  The Internet has become
> a junk yard of electronic news and mail.  The information usually received
> from the Internet isn't worth reading.

What do you mean by "usually"?  I subscribe to approximately 20 mailing 
lists that sometimes take two hours to read, such as this one, communet, 
etc., and I find most of the postings to be thoughtful if not thought 
provoking.  Of course, there are some that are repetitive, but I think 
that much of that is due to poor editing skills on behalf of the poster.

> Once I thought the Internet would be something I could show my kids and
> let them learn from using it - however today it's filth and foul language
> idiots keep us at a distance.

Most of what I have seen on the Internet has been fairly interesting to 
me, and I am no rocket scientist...just a 40+ year old with an interest 
in reading, writing and learning.  The only filth & foul language that I 
have seen has been in some Usenet alt. posts.  

My nine year old daughter is as fascinated with the "Net" as she was with 
certain television based electronic game machines, and I keep her away 
from the Usenet sections by sitting with her at the desk so that we can 
learn together.

> This is what we call the Information Superhighway has turned out to be
> a dark backroad in Mississippi.  Engineers have a lot to learn from 
> the Internet's mistakes, and the government really needs to regulate
> what goes on.  

Magazines and newspapers suffer from some of these same problems, but we 
have learned to cull the wheat from the chaff. As for the "government 
needing to regulate what goes on", I strongly disagree.  If the government 
was more like you and me, I wouldn't have a problem with it.  They are not.
The government is fickle and changes with the loudest prevailing wind.
I have been a government employee for twenty-four years and I have seen 
the winds blow.

> I back the Clinton on Clipper and other issues.  The internet needs
> an authority, since you people have no conception that your abusing
> the public.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
Sir, YOU must be the authority as this is the most interactive, operator 
responsive, mediums available. You must be the person that finds the 
positive mailing lists, gopher sites, etc. for your children to view and use.

--Steve Covington
  Gilroy, CA


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post