[11422] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: The simple equation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Nordlund)
Fri Apr 1 15:07:53 1994
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 1994 09:28:03 +0000
From: Dave Nordlund <NORDLUND@ccstaff.cc.ukans.edu>
To: Christopher Davis <ckd@kei.com>, com-priv@lists.psi.com
> Date sent: Thu, 31 Mar 1994 12:55:41 -0500
> From: Christopher Davis <ckd@kei.com>
> To: com-priv@lists.psi.com
> Subject: The simple equation
> For the $10K/yr a network provider pays the CIX, they get contractually
> guaranteed non-AUP no-settlement routing to the direct customers of all
> other CIX members.
>
Chris
You try to make it too simple. What is your definition of a "direct
customer"? If it is another network, your rule may not work.
> That's it. Bing.
>
> If you don't think those contractual guarantees are worth $10K/yr, by all
> means, don't pay it. You'll probably get the packets routed anyway. Of
> course, if you're running a business, "probably" may not be good enough
> for your customers.
>
> This is a business decision that each ISP will have to make for
> themselves.
>
> It is not "extortion". It is not "protection money". If you think that
> appeals to the enlightened self-interest of other ISPs will get your
> packets routed, that's fine. Again, it probably will.
>
> I can get to Digex (since they've already been used as an example in this
> discussion) just fine. I can get to clark.net (also mentioned in this
> discussion) without a hitch. And so on.
>
> Clearly, Karl feels that the $10K/yr is money well spent to provide better
> guarantees to his customers. Clearly, "nowhere" disagrees (vehemently :-).
> --
> * Christopher Davis * <ckd@kei.com> * (was <ckd@eff.org>) * MIME * [CKD1] *
> "It's 106 ms to Chicago, we've got a full disk of GIFs, half a meg of
> hypertext, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses." "Click it."
>
Dave Nordlund nordlund@ccstaff.cc.ukans.edu
University of Kansas 913/864-0450
Computing Services FAX 913/864-0485
Lawrence, KS 66045