[1129] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: CIX Association, Inc.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eliot)
Fri Aug 9 05:50:33 1991

Date: Thu, 8 Aug 91 23:19:36 -0700
From: lear@genbank.bio.net (Eliot)
To: wls@psi.com
Cc: com-priv@uu.psi.com, lear@genbank.bio.net

Hmmm... interesting.

> 1. Members agree not to restrict the use of their network based on traffic..

Maybe Gordon will correct me, but I as recall there are applicable
laws governing the use of federally funded networks.  In fact, I
believe I remember seeing usage language in some HPCCI bill.  Does
this allow gov't networks to join?

> 2. [No Settlements]

So CIX wishes to be viewed as a peer of ANS.  Is it OK for ANS to
connect to CIX with a 19200 connection?

> 3. All members must be legally organized to provide TCP/IP or OSI
> public data internetworking services to the public in multiple
> geographic areas.

Read:  No baby bells.  No regionals.  I hope I'm confused.  Please
explain.

> 4. [You Pay].

> 5. [You Pay].

> 6. [You DON'T sue].

Will you have anything to do with setting standards?  If so, do you
think such membership requirements are defensible?
-- 
Eliot Lear
[lear@turbo.bio.net]

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post