[11157] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: ANS and the CIX - have they really connected?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Nordlund)
Wed Mar 23 07:30:13 1994
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 94 17:22:51 CST
From: Dave Nordlund <NORDLUND@ukanvm.cc.ukans.edu>
To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.com>
Cc: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: Message of Tue, 22 Mar 1994 00:37:53 -0600 (CST) from
<karl@mcs.com>
On Tue, 22 Mar 1994 00:37:53 -0600 (CST) you said:
>Hi Doug,
>
>
>In other words, you take <packet> data and convert the format. My, doesn't
>that look an awful lot like using SOCKS to evade the same issue.
>
>You didn't source the packets. Your customers did. That still loses in my
>interpretation, and I suspect that of many other CIX members (but I don't
>presume to speak for them).
>
If my customer is using my IP number from a Shell account to do a Telnet,
is that different from my customer using my IP number from my terminal server
running SLIP?
We swallow the camel and gag on the fly!
>The <protocol> isn't the point. The fact that you're routing <packets> for
>them is, and that they originate those packets.
>
They originate the packets whether they are SLIP or SHELL connected!
>Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.COM) | MCSNet - Full Internet Connectivity (shell,
DAVE NORDLUND NORDLUND@UKANVM.BITNET
COMPUTING SERVICES NORDLUND@UKANVM.CC.UKANS.EDU
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS 913/864-0450
LAWRENCE, KS 66045 FAX 913/864-0485
