[11155] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet
Re: ANS and the CIX - have they really connected?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Herbert)
Wed Mar 23 05:46:08 1994
To: Simon Poole <poole@magnolia.eunet.ch>
Cc: gwh@crl.com (George Herbert), karl@mcs.com, matthew@echo.com,
com-priv@psi.com, cook@path.net, fair@apple.com,
stpeters@dawn.crd.ge.com, washburn@cix.org, gwh@crl.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Mar 1994 12:12:06 +0100."
<199403221113.MAA27805@chsun.eunet.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 1994 14:48:11 -0800
From: George Herbert <gwh@crl.com>
>> And yes, sub-companies should count.
>You mean that you want all Sprint subsideries, all EUnet national operators
>etc. to have a vote? The small providers would be seriously out-numbered in
>such a scenario.
No, sub companies would count for geographical area coverage requirements...
Again, this is getting into internal CIX business where they get to
decide how they set up their organization. I'm only concerned about
making buyins a little more accessable.
-george william herbert
Speaking only for myself
