[10938] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: flat-rate=cross subsidy (was: FCC strikes the internet)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Denninger)
Tue Mar 15 04:51:25 1994

From: karl@mcs.com (Karl Denninger)
To: Rbohn@ucsd.edu (Roger Bohn)
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 23:27:40 -0600 (CST)
Cc: karl@mcs.com, fidelman@civicnet.org, com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199403142054.MAA18638@ucsd.edu> from "Roger Bohn" at Mar 14, 94 12:54:26 pm

> At  6:53 PM 3/13/94 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
> 
> >Finally, let's look at this.  You wanted originally flat-rate email.  Now
> >all of a sudden its SLIP access.  That's MASSIVELY expanded service, is it
> >not?  Yes, there are companies (mine is one) which will sell you that kind
> >of service.  Are you arguing for <mandating> this?  What if it turns out
> >that 2-3 years from now the "flat rate" ends up being "24 hour connected
> >for 90% of the users" and it becomes impossible to support that pricing
> >model?
> 
> Just a reminder:  Karl is alluding some of the key tradeoffs with flat rate
> pricing.  Don't pretend flat rates are for the good of the individual end
> users; they wind up causing light users to subsidize heavy users, which
> means _from_ individuals, _to_ small business/stay at home offices.
> 
> A flat rate, which exactly covers all costs, ends up creating a subsidy for
> the heavy users, at the expense of the light users.  (Since under usage
> based pricing, light users would pay only a little, and heavy users pay a
> lot; yet total revenue collected is the same or higher.)  It also leads to
> inefficiency, since no one has an incentive to conserve on login time.  (In
> most but not all network architectures, this would raise costs, for
> everyone.)

Only if usage-sensitive pricing isn't offered.

In our case at MCSNet, it is.  You can CHOOSE.

What I dislike is the government trying to tell me that one or the other
models of that form is wrong, that I must offer either, or that I may not
offer either.  Any such proposal is a restraint on my company's choice.

-- 
--
Karl Denninger (karl@MCS.COM) 	| MCSNet - Full Internet Connectivity (shell,
Modem: [+1 312 248-0900]	| PPP, SLIP and more) in Chicago and 'burbs.  
Voice/FAX: [+1 312 248-8649]	| Email "info@mcs.com".  MCSNet is a CIX member.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post