[10924] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: The FCC strikes the Internet (fwd)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miles R Fidelman)
Mon Mar 14 18:55:51 1994

Date: Mon, 14 Mar 1994 12:09:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Miles R Fidelman <fidelman@civicnet.org>
To: com-priv@psi.com
In-Reply-To: <199403140751.XAA02960@netcom9.netcom.com>

On Sun, 13 Mar 1994, Glenn S. Tenney wrote:

> >Neither I, nor The Center for Civic Networking, have ever espoused a
> >position in favor of mandated, flat-rate email service.  I/we agree with
> >those who point out that cheap email is already a reality.
> >
> >Rather, we have espoused a goal of universal, cheap, flat-rate IP service.
> 
> Then, Miles, could you please clarify the following statement from The
> Center for Civic Networking re: the flat-rate email proposal from Jamie
> Love (I included a few extra lines for context, but the last two sentences
> are the key):
> 
>   At 12:24 PM 2/25/94 -0500, Richard Civille wrote:
>   > On Thu, 24 Feb 1994, Johna Johnson wrote:
>   >> In other words, we're talking a regulated basic rate service offered by
>   >> some carriers, with additional services offered by any interested
>   >> carriers?
>   >This is close to our view.  We believe not only that Internet email will
>   >become the model for a future basic service, we also believe that a
>   >flat-rate tariffed "pipeline" to government and public information
>   >disseminated over the Internet -- the precursor to the NII -- is very
>   >important to consider in the present legislative debates in Washington.
>   >What is important is that the flat-rate, capacity-based pricing principle
>   >of the Internet is preserved, when the net is accessed through a telco
>   >common carrier or a cable-based service.  This is why we support the
>   >notion of a flat-rate basic Internet tariff.  Whether such a tariff should
>   >be constrained only to email is another issue and I could imagine cases
>   >where it should be expanded.
> 
> The last sentence sure sounds as if The Center for Civic Networking *WAS*
> supporting the flat-rate email initiative.  Perhaps the problem is that
> some people view access to the Internet to *BE* email rather than IP
> service.
> 

I think this is a case of late night writing :(  


**************************************************************************
Miles R. Fidelman                   mfidelman@civicnet.org
Executive Director                  91 Baldwin St. Charlestown MA 02129 
The Center for Civic Networking     617-241-9205 fax: 617-241-5064

Check out our gopher server:  
CCN - The Center for Civic Networking
on the list of all gopher servers in the world.

Information Infrastructure: Public Spaces for the 21st Century
Let's Start With: Internet Wall-Plugs Everywhere
Then We Can Worry About: "Switched, Interactive, Broadband Services"
**************************************************************************


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post