[1020] in Commercialization & Privatization of the Internet

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Pornography" on the net

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John S. Quarterman)
Tue Jul 16 12:17:43 1991

Date: Mon, 15 Jul 91 23:54:52 cdt
From: jsq@tic.com (John S. Quarterman)
To: com-priv@uu.psi.com
Cc: edtjda@magic322.chron.com, jsq@tic.com

	I claim that the Internet and Usenet are pretty much the same thing.
	A recent paper on tcp traffic measurements (anon ftp
	/pub/tcpmeasurements.ps from ftp.ee.lbl.gov) showed that NNTP traffic
	was a significant portion of total traffic.  A lot of news is
	propagated over the Internet.

By the same argument, the Internet and the UUCP mail network are pretty
much the same thing, since much mail originating on UUCP passes over the
Internet.  And the Internet and BITNET are pretty much the same thing,
for the same reason.  And what about the Internet and CompuServe, and....
If the Internet is pretty much the same thing as the sum of all the
networks out there, why does it need a specific name?

USENET goes a lot of places the Internet doesn't; many of them places
where you can't use FTP or TELNET or SMTP, nor even NNTP.  The Internet
and USENET are not the same thing.  Part of the Internet carries part
of USENET.

If you're trying to say that USENET news has become a very widespread
service on the Internet, that's probably true.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post