[9400] in bugtraq
More oshare testing (cont.)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Tomas_Bj=F6rklund?=)
Mon Feb 8 03:07:54 1999
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 12:51:56 +0100
Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tomas_Bj=F6rklund?= <t.bjorklund@WINEASY.SE>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tomas_Bj=F6rklund?= <t.bjorklund@WINEASY.SE>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To: <36B8956C.ED8DFF11@vivid.net>
I have also seen some different behaviours when using oshare.
oshare from a Linux 2.0.34 server (which is in the closet, everyone has=
one
right?) against my Dell Latitude portable computer with Windows 98 engl=
ish
version without any updates or patches and a Xircom CE3 10/100 PCMCIA c=
ard
resulted in a spontaneus reboot.
But from work on a Linux 2.0.33 against several stationary computers ru=
nning
the same Windows 98 without any patches the oshare flood didn't do much=
, didn't
even slow down the target computer. The NIC's in these computers are 3c=
om
10Mbit PCI cards and some Intel Etherexpress 10/100.
Regards Tomas Bj=F6rklund
Staff @ Wineasy - http://www.wineasy.se/
