[8202] in bugtraq
Re: Redhat man exploit
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike)
Tue Oct 13 17:41:07 1998
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 20:03:04 +0100
Reply-To: Mike Ricketts <rickettm@ox.compsoc.net>
From: Mike <mike@OAKLEY.KEBLE.OX.AC.UK>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981009112536.2090y-100000@ume.pht.co.jp>
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, Scott Stone wrote:
> re: Redhat man exploit code posted to bugtraq
>
> The code says that RH 4.2 and 'others?' are vulnerable. I just tested
> this on TurboLinux 2.0, and it's not vulnerable - I suspect that RH 5.x is
> not vulnerable either, but I haven't tested that.
>
RedHAt 5.1 isn't.
--
Mike <rickettm@ox.compsoc.net>
Military secrets are the most fleeting of all.
-- Spock, "The Enterprise Incident", stardate 5027.4
