[8158] in bugtraq
Re: SCO Openserver 5.0.5 syn-floodable
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Van Allen)
Fri Oct 9 15:20:44 1998
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:51:39 -0400
Reply-To: Dave Van Allen <dave@FAST.NET>
From: Dave Van Allen <dave@FAST.NET>
X-To: Eric <readalot@SKINNY.ISWNET.COM>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
Eric,
I've forwarded your message on to a few 'friend' addresses at SCO, just to
try to help. I would suggest giving your re-seller or SCO support another
ping on this before you give up.
I can tell you with thorough knowledge, that SCO is extremely committed to
safe-UNIX and reacts to reports of bugs and deficiencies when they are
processed through the correct channels... which at times is not the most
convenient way for folks like us. I have recently suggested to them to pay
closer attention to sources like bugtraq and I was pleased to know that they
are here, and watching carefully. They aren't however responding to the
list; I suggested that would be a Good Idea.
I don't work for SCO, and this message contains my opinions only. Since I
don't see a balance here in bugtraq when reports are presented concerning
SCO, from SCO, I am simply stepping in to say they "hear", respect, and
respond to reports from this list.
Best regards,
David Van Allen - FASTNET(tm) / You Tools Corporation
dave@fast.net (888)321-FAST(3278) http://www.fast.net
FASTNET - Business and Personal Internet Solutions
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric [mailto:readalot@SKINNY.ISWNET.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 12:15 PM
> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
> Subject: SCO Openserver 5.0.5 syn-floodable
>
>
> I don't know if this has been mentioned already but I just
> installed the new SCO Openserver 5.0.5 release and noticed
> that I could syn-flood ports. I reported it to SCO but they
> haven't bothered to tell me how to fix it and that was two
> weeks ago.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
