[6549] in bugtraq

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Nasty security hole in "lprm"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gian Uberto Lauri)
Mon Apr 20 15:32:36 1998

Date: 	Mon, 20 Apr 1998 11:23:11 +0200
Reply-To: saint@dei.unipd.it
From: Gian Uberto Lauri <saint@DEI.UNIPD.IT>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To:  message from Chris Evans on Sat, 18 Apr 1998 15:42:11 +0100

>>>>> "CE" == Chris Evans <chris@FERRET.LMH.OX.AC.UK> writes:

CE> If trying to remove entries from a remote queue, the args given
CE> are basically strcat()'ed into a static buffer.

CE> Thus:

CE> lprm -Psome_remote `perl -e 'print "a" x 2000'` Segmentation fault

CE> gdb confirms the program is attempting to execute code at
CE> 0x41414141

Confirmed. Solaris 2.6 has the same problem.

/usr/ucb/lprm is a symlink to /usr/bin/cancel that is setyid root

/*
 * Please note : comandi is a file containing the command to start
 * cancel with the 2000 'a' passed as parameter.
 */

{betty} 11:09:44
[15]/tmp:adb -P"Pollo:" -I /tmp ./cancel
Pollo:$<comandi
Pollo:SIGSEGV: Segmentation Fault (address not mapped   to object)
stopped at:
0xef6fe9b8:     ldsb    [%o1], %o5
Pollo:$r
g0    0x0                               l0      0xeffff79c
g1    0xef7459f4                        l1      0x63940
g2    0x3f57d                           l2      0xef6fe93c
g3    0x3e17c                           l3      0x0
g4    0x3e164                           l4      0x80
g5    0x0                               l5      0x80
g6    0x0                               l6      0x7
g7    0x0                               l7      0xfc09ab80
o0    0xef74fbec                        i0      0xef74fbec
o1    0x61616161                        i1      0x370ec
o2    0x0                               i2      0xef76227c
o3    0x0                               i3      0x0
o4    0xef76227c                        i4      0xeffff79c
o5    0xef6fe954                        i5      0xef7fd8b4  _end+0x878
sp    0xefffe378                        fp      0xefffe3d8
o7    0xef6fe980                        i7      0xef6dba68
y     0x0
psr   0x4001084
pc    0xef6fe9b8 0xef6fe9b8:    ldsb    [%o1], %o5
npc   0xef6fe9bc 0xef6fe9bc:    ldsb    [%o0], %g1

Solaris 2.5.5.1 has not the problem.

                                        Gian Uberto Lauri
                                        saint@dei.unipd.it

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post