[6219] in bugtraq
Re: strcpy versus strncpy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Laurie)
Tue Mar 3 23:48:23 1998
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 18:50:52 +0000
Reply-To: Ben Laurie <ben@ALGROUP.CO.UK>
From: Ben Laurie <ben@ALGROUP.CO.UK>
X-To: Edwin Li-Kai Liu <robin.hood@IBM.NET>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
Edwin Li-Kai Liu wrote:
> If you use C++, you can write a string class (I think someone already did that?
> M$?) that uses dynamic buffer allocation and upon object destruction the buffer
> is released. This will prevent memory hole, but performance suffers!
The string class is part of the Standard C++ Library (or is it STL?
Whatever, it is standard).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Laurie |Phone: +44 (181) 735 0686| Apache Group member
Freelance Consultant |Fax: +44 (181) 735 0689|http://www.apache.org
and Technical Director|Email: ben@algroup.co.uk |
A.L. Digital Ltd, |Apache-SSL author http://www.apache-ssl.org/
London, England. |"Apache: TDG" http://www.ora.com/catalog/apache
