[4526] in bugtraq
Re: OOB Bug stills persists after hot fix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ervin Fried)
Tue May 20 16:37:19 1997
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 12:36:38 -0400
Reply-To: Ervin Fried <ervin@NAME.NET>
From: Ervin Fried <ervin@NAME.NET>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To: <33806DB8.A104665E@unt.edu>
We applied the OOB hotfix to 2 NT Server 4.0, SP2 machines
Then we tested it with the Perl version of nuke (nuke.pl), on a Win95 machine.
Result: blue screen, reboot needed.
Are there any success stories about OOB hotfix?
Maybe is something particular to our servers ...
Ervin Fried
At 10:11 AM 5/19/97 -0500, Dan Freise wrote:
>Matthew Dovey wrote:
>
>> http://pobox.leidenuniv.nl/%7Eewit/winnuke/, the Mac binary also listed
>> on that page appears to still be capable of downing an NT 4.0
>
> It does.
>> Does anyone know what is peculiar about the Mac implementation of the
>
> Oddly enough, there is nothing peculiar about the mac implementation.
>Upon compiling the mac source on two separate UNIX machines, the
>resulting binary fails to crash an NT box.
>
> The obvious conclusion is that Apple's Open Transport somehow sends a
>different packet than most other TCP/IP implementations.
>
> If I get the time to dig the packets apart, I'll post the results
here
>as well.
>--
>Dan Freise ____ http://autobahn.cascss.unt.edu/~dan
>A&S Computing Services \ /
>(817) 565-4498 \/ dan@unt.edu
>
>
