[3965] in bugtraq
Re: Ut oh..another port on NT4
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jwp@CHEM.UCSD.EDU)
Sun Jan 26 10:27:55 1997
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 15:01:42 -0800
Reply-To: jwp@CHEM.UCSD.EDU
From: jwp@CHEM.UCSD.EDU
X-To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
To: BUGTRAQ@netspace.org
Jason T. Luttgens wrote:
> Upon experimenting on port 65589 I found another way....
From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
> Ahem. Ports are 16 bit quantities. So, really, this is port 53, or the DNS
> port as it is better known.
True, but it's still not particularly pleasant behavior.
-- John W Pierce, Chem & Biochem, UC San Diego
jwp@ucsd.edu
