[35780] in bugtraq
Re: Microsoft and Security
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lucas Holt)
Sun Jul 18 23:11:10 2004
In-Reply-To: <40F27A4F.10101@ncmail.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <DC1853BD-D78A-11D8-B1E2-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alun Jones <alun@texis.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
bugtraq@securityfocus.com
From: Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:47:20 -0400
To: Charles Otstot <charles.otstot@ncmail.net>
On Jul 12, 2004, at 7:47 AM, Charles Otstot wrote:
>
> I won't argue the rest of your points, however, this one I would
> consider invalid. Here, I have to agree with Microsoft's original
> concept. Those with pirated copies have no claim to, nor a right to,
> any fixes (security or otherwise) from Microsoft. While an argument
> could be made that not permitting these people to have fixes could
> endanger innocent users and others with legal copies, this is at best
> a morally ambiguous and thin argument. The simple fact is, those who
> use pirated software (be it Microsoft's or anyone else's), are simply
> thieves who do not deserve to reap any benefits from their actions.
>
>
> Charlie
>
I have to disagree with this. Its not about endangerment.. legit users
must upgrade their software to avoid risk. The problem is that
internet worms eat up bandwidth on the net and slow down servers and
clients with useless requests. If we can limit the number of users who
run antique software, the whole world is a better place. :)
Then we just have to worry about other malicious attacks and script
kiddies playing.
Lucas Holt
Luke@FoolishGames.com
________________________________________________________
FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site)
JustJournal.com (Free blogging)
