[35285] in bugtraq
Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 515-1] New lha packages fix several vulnerabilities; Re:
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (GOTO Masanori)
Mon Jun 14 17:12:50 2004
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:11:17 +0900
Message-ID: <81pt88nrnu.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: lw@wszia.edu.pl, bugtraq@securityfocus.com,
GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.org>, Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040608232315.18419.qmail@mail.datacolo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hi,
At Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:32:48 -0700,
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 04:28:56PM -0000, lw@wszia.edu.pl wrote:
> > In-Reply-To: <20040605203922.GW19402@alcor.net>
> >
> > i didn't bother to check deb package, but this patch:
> > > http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/non-free/l/lha/lha_1.14i-2woody1.diff.gz
> > applied to this package:
> > > Size/MD5 checksum: 21414 0f990fd920ea4770dd088a97c1c87f18
> > > http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/non-free/l/lha/lha_1.14i.orig.tar.gz
> >
> > has not fixed this problem:
> > http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/363418
> > POC is at:
> > http://lw.ftw.zamosc.pl/lha-exploit.txt
Thanks for your checking, you're right and actually sample program
(lha-exploit.txt) causes the problem.
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51285
> > is some dull discussion about that bug.
This patch seems being appropriate. I'll check again, and I'll
prepare the next version for this problem.
Regards,
-- gotom
