[34541] in bugtraq

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ZA Security Hole

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Samps)
Fri Apr 16 14:45:21 2004

Message-ID: <407F2709.6050006@redjocks.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:51:29 +0930
From: Samps <samps@redjocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
In-Reply-To: <000d01c42261$552cfbc0$0100a8c0@BlueBox>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Damjan Kreft wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> I think, I discover some kind of security hole in ZoneAlaram - any version.
> The problem is hidding in E-mail Protection. Because I'm form Slovenia (not
> Slovakia), our alphabet does have some letters with roof (c - è, s - ¹, z -
> ¾). And when the name of e-mail attachment contain any of these three
> letters, it don't go to the qurarantine (if the attachment do have right
> extension of course). 
> 
> Greets, Damjan


I played around a bit to find out whether my own computer (with 
ZoneAlarm Pro) was vulnerable and, accidentally, found a similar 
behaviour from my ISPs mailserver, apparently being Exim 4.24.

When attaching any 'normally' named .EXE, my email is returned to me by 
Exim, with a note saying: "This kind of attachment is not good for 
you.....".
If I rename the same .EXE to, say, (c).exe, it gets delivered and 
ZoneAlarm lets it in without quarantining it.

Two bugs for the price of one!


cheers
Samps

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post