[34495] in bugtraq
Re: Full-Disclosure is now ILLEGAL in France ! (Vulnerabilties,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Johnson)
Fri Apr 9 13:50:36 2004
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Chris Johnson <johnson@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
To: Geoffrey <esoteric@3times25.net>
Cc: K-OTiK Security <Special-Alerts@k-otik.com>, <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>,
Chris Johnson <johnson@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4076C629.3060600@3times25.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404091153260.11871-100000@maequeses.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Geoffrey wrote:
> Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > This is and always has been in the Napoleonic Code if I remember
> > correctly from my school days.
>
> Then you don't want to do business in Louisiana, USA either then. The
> laws there are based on the Napoleonic code as well. One reason they
> have parishes rather than counties..
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
> Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft
>
I should have been more explicit. The assumption of guilt
before innocense is a part of French law and has been since Napoleonic
times I believe. You'll find that Napoleonic law and that which is
derived from it (including Louisiana law) is a very different creature
than that which is derived from English Common Law. The wording of
the French law doesn't surprise me at all.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Johnson |Internet: johnson@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Systems Administrator |Web: http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson
NMR Center |Voice: 617.726.0949
Mass. General Hospital |FAX: 617.726.7422
149 (2301) 13th Street |If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more
Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA |happy people? Tea bag tag
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
