[25442] in bugtraq
Re: Unfortunate interaction between EZMLM and MessageLabs virus scanning
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Cope)
Sat May 11 19:33:11 2002
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 16:14:51 +1200
From: Stephen Cope <mail@unsolicited.kimihia.org.nz>
To: Alun Jones <alun@texis.com>
Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Message-ID: <20020511041451.GA442@mess.kimihia.org.nz>
Mail-Followup-To: Alun Jones <alun@texis.com>,
bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020509072420.01c9c458@208.55.91.110>
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Because the message is being *returned* as containing a virus, shouldn't
it then use the address in the Return-Path header?
It is a bounce message, not a *reply* (in which case it should use the
Reply-To or From header, as per the RFC 2822 3.6.2).
--=20
Stephen Cope - http://sdc.org.nz/
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: See http://sdc.org.nz/email for more detail
iEYEARECAAYFAjzcmrsACgkQ4Bjb33S48hatqwCfQFliMVe2D9reA0VxN5MU5iBu
UOYAoKjA6isrrq2Mcm+dXrAR+Y7ZXEJQ
=Bj7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
