[23519] in bugtraq

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

SpiDynamics WebInspect - Keeping Track of its Users?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (A.S.)
Sat Dec 15 17:50:03 2001

Date: 15 Dec 2001 15:12:26 -0000
Message-ID: <20011215151226.8160.qmail@mail.securityfocus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "A.S." <DB@globalapathy.com>
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com



                    WebInspect - *Privacy ALERT*

        ------Cut and paste from SpiDynamics Website--
----
WebInspect, S.P.I. Dynamic's premier product, is the 
most comprehensive network-based web application 
security solution ever designed. It dynamically 
uncovers well-known static security holes, as well as 
security vulnerabilities specific to your own custom 
web applications, working with your existing security 
software to re-enforce and strengthen functionality. 
Using patent-pending logic, WebInspect hones in on 
a new class of vulnerabilities undetected by any other 
scanner currently on the market. 
        ------End cut and paste from SpiDynamics 
Website------


        Basically it's a vulnerability scanner that you use 
to remotely test your website for potential security 
holes. A demo of it is available for download from the 
SpiDynamics Website 
(http://www.spidynamics.com) for the cost of filling 
out an information form.

        I've come to the conclusion that SpiDynamics is 
keeping track of atleast what sites you are scanning 
with their software and possibly much more.  What's 
worse is that there's NO mention of this "Reporting" 
activity on the part of the software in the EULA(End 
User License Agreement) that you must agree to 
before you install their demo of WebInspect.  I'm no 
legal expert, Or master hacker...But anyone can see 
that something strange is going on here. And a lead 
developer from their company even admitted to me 
on the telephone that "I had found a Bug".  The thing 
is, that I personally think it's intentional, and not just 
some accidental oversight on their part. It seems to 
me that this is Highly illegal, almost to the point of 
evesdropping...but like I said i'm no legal expert, you 
be the judge... 
http://www.globalapathy.com/news/default.asp (Read 
full article here)

-DB



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post