[20345] in bugtraq
Apology: Advisory numbering confusion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Olle Segerdahl)
Fri Apr 20 18:45:16 2001
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3AE03A17.A561A801@defcom.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:31:03 +0200
Reply-To: Olle Segerdahl <olle@DEFCOM.COM>
From: Olle Segerdahl <olle@DEFCOM.COM>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
I would like to apologise on behalf of Defcom Security
for the confusion about numbering of recent advisories.
Unfortunately, Enrique Sanchez of Defcom Spain recently
released two advisories that did not conform to the
Defcom Labs Advisory numbering scheme.
To clear up the issue:
def-2000-18 has NEVER EXISTED.
def-2001-19 was released on 2001-04-05 and is entitled:
Windows 2000 FTP Client Buffer Overflow
The advisories released by Enrique Sanchez have been
reassigned the folowing Defcom Labs Advisory numbers:
def-2001-22 Cyberscheduler remote root compromise
def-2001-23 innfeed buffer overflow
All Defcom Labs releases are available on the Defcom Labs
website located at http://labs.defcom.com/
Once again I apologise for the confusion apparently due
to an internal communication problem.
We have taken steps to assure that this kind of egg will
never again be on our faces. (Knock on wood)
Olle Segerdahl
Defcom Labs
