[20163] in bugtraq
Re: PIX Firewall 5.1 DoS Vulnerability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hugo van der Kooij)
Wed Apr 11 18:01:49 2001
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104111830330.14862-100000@hvdkooij.xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:31:10 +0200
Reply-To: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@VANDERKOOIJ.ORG>
From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@VANDERKOOIJ.ORG>
X-To: Siddhartha Jain <losttoy2000@YAHOO.CO.UK>
To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
In-Reply-To: <027001c0c129$14b7e5b0$1a01010a@sid>
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Siddhartha Jain wrote:
> Could this vulnerability exist in other Cisco products using TACACS+ for
> authentication? For eg. Cisco routers?
PIX code is maintained seperatly from IOS code AFAIK.
Hugo.
--
Alle email aan mij verzonden is gebonden aan de regels beschreven op
mijn homepage.
All email send to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland
hvdkooij@vanderkooij.org http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
