[10476] in bugtraq

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Domino [was: AS/400]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Magosanyi Arpad)
Fri May 7 13:46:44 1999

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Message-Id: <19990507084411.B8889@bunuel.tii.matav.hu>
Date: 	Fri, 7 May 1999 08:44:11 +0200
Reply-To: Magosanyi Arpad <mag@BUNUEL.TII.MATAV.HU>
From: Magosanyi Arpad <mag@BUNUEL.TII.MATAV.HU>
X-To:         Pavel Ahafonau <paully@IBA.COM.BY>
To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG
In-Reply-To:  <no.id>; from Pavel Ahafonau on Wed, May 05,
              1999 at 01:34:40PM +0200

A levelez=F5m azt hiszi, hogy Pavel Ahafonau a k=F6vetkez=F5eket =EDrta=
:
> As for SMTP and Lotus Notes/Domino this is a big problem for it's use=
rs
> because there no any anti-spam protection like in Sendmail.
> Now we are playing with 5th Lotus Domino and there are all this bugs =
fixed
> and anti-spam implemented ~80)

There are still problems with Domino anti-spam: If you send a smtp mail
to a domino user who's forwarding address is a smtp address, the domino
smtp MTA will reject the message.

This is security related only by the fact that most of the notes admins
will choose to disable anti-spam after encountering this problem first.

--
GNU GPL: csak tiszta forr=E1sb=F3l

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post