|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905051649030.15339-100000@db85> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 16:52:44 +0800 Reply-To: Yung-Sheng Tang <jeff@DB.CSIE.NCU.EDU.TW> From: Yung-Sheng Tang <jeff@DB.CSIE.NCU.EDU.TW> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG In-Reply-To: <199905041341.JAA26557@paranor.wpafb.af.mil> On Tue, 4 May 1999, Paul Diehl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Anthony Clarke wrote: > > This hole has been verified on both Linux and Solaris with Oracle 8.0.5. It > > probably exists in all Unix versions of 8.0.5. Whether it exists in later > > versions is unknown. (I don't believe it exists in 8.0.4, but I can't > > verify that at the moment) > > This hole exists for Oracle 8.0.3 on Solaris as well. > Maybe not. Our Oracle 8.0.3 on Solaris doesn't have root-owned oratclsh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |